The ballroom decision turns a lot on standing, which we will get to later in the semester, so I don't want to throw too much of it at you. But this piece by Prof. Dorf (Cornell) also touches on a specific problem related to the shadow docket: A stay should be proper only if the lower court erred under existing law, not if it properly applied existing law but the Court plans to change that law. But in this and other cases, the majority has granted stays under what it plans to turn the law into.
Save this. We will come back to the standing piece later on.
