Minnesota enacted a law prohibiting businesses from holding mandatory employee meetings; plaintiffs (a group of businesses) sued the Governor, AG, and Commissioner of the State Department of Labor and Industry. The court held that the Governor and Commissioner lack enforcement authority and that the AG had issued a public proclamation disclaiming intent to enforce. But the analysis jumps back-and-forth between EpY and sovereign immunity (the stated basis for dismissal) and standing (the AG intent not to enforce would seem to go to the likelihood-of-enforcement prong in SBA).
